Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after the parties settled their dispute in Execution Proceedings No. 33 of 2022, with the settlement pursis placed on record and both counsel stating the petition did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
35-WP-2637-2017.docx
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2637 OF 2017
Basappa Bandu Ambi … Petitioner
Vs.
The Bhairavnath Nagari … Respondent Bigarshethi Sah. Patsanstha Maryadit and Anr.
Mr. D. V. Sutar a/w. Mr. Kiran G. Kulkarni and Ms. Deepali Jain for the Petitioner.
Mr. Prajakt M. Junwadkar for the Respondent.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 5th JANUARY 2024
P.C.
between the parties in execution proceedings. Copy of the pursis recording settlement in the execution proceedings, is placed on record.
Both the counsels state that in view of the settlement recorded in the
Execution Proceedings No. 33 of 2022 petition does not survive.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAJESHWARI RAMESH RAMESH PILLAI PILLAI Date: 2024.01.06 15:42:24 +0530
1/1
Basappa Bandu Ambi
The Bhairavnath Nagari Bigarshethi Sah. Patsanstha Maryadit
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court