The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition after her claim was satisfied and the entire amount was paid to her. The Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the petition and the pending civil application on instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-WP-2579-2023.odt
2024:BHC-AUG:180-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2579 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5458 OF 2020
POONAM SUDAMRAO MUGAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr. K. J. Ghute Patil, Advocate for Petitioner
Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
Mr. S. V. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE:03.01.2024
PER COURT :-
1.The learned Advocate for the Petitioner has placed his
hand written request motion on 02.01.2024 on record, seeking
leave to withdraw this Petition, since the Petitioner’s claim has
been satisfied and the entire amount has been paid to her. The
said oral communication is marked as “X” for identifications.
2.In view of the above, thisPetition is disposed off on
instructions.
1 of 2
901-WP-2579-2023
(( 2 ))
3. Pending Civil Application would not survive and stands
disposed off.
[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ]
SMS
2 of 2
POONAM SUDAMRAO MUGAL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court