Prem Tikamdas Sachanandani v. Rajendra v Singh and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Counsel for the petitioner sought a short adjournment in a criminal writ petition as the advocate on record was in personal difficulty. The court adjourned the matter to 9th July 2024 without deciding anything.
What the court decided
3-ASWP-2448-2024.DOC
Gitalaxmi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2448 OF 2024
Prem Tikamdas Sachanandani …Petitioner Versus Rajendra V. Singh & Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Aditya Sawant h/f Mr. Amol Patankar for the Petitioner. Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED: 26th June 2024
PC:-
1. Mr. Aditya Sawant, learned counsel holding for Mr. Amol Patankar, the Advocate on record for the Petitioner, seeks a short accommodation since the main Advocate is in personal difficulty.
2. Stand over to 9th July 2024.
(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prem Tikamdas Sachanandani
- respondent
Rajendra V. Singh
- respondent
Respondent-State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · R. N. Laddha
- Order 2 · R. N. Laddha
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court