The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad heard two writ petitions wherein the petitioners circulated a motion for withdrawal of the petitions. Noting the absence of any objection from the respondents, the court disposed of both writ petitions as withdrawn.
Both writ petitions disposed of as withdrawn on instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:6570-DB
1 901wp2444a2445o20
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 WRIT PETITION NO. 2444 OF 2020
VAISHALI NILESH KAWATHEKAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2445 OF 2020
SYED ASHFAQ AHMED SYED CHAND VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Shri T.K. Sant i/by Shri Pratap P. Mandlik, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Shri S.K. Tambe, AGP for the Respondents/State.
Shri Kunal Kale i/by Shri D.R. Deshmukh, Advocates for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
R.M. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE :- 21st March, 2024
Per Court :-
that a motion for withdrawal of these petitions has been
circulated on instructions. The Petitioners desire to avail of the
remedy as is permissible in law.
2 901wp2444a2445o20
disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions, with liberty to avail
of the remedy as is permissible in law.
Vaishali Nilesh Kawathekar
Syed Ashfaq Ahmed Syed Chand
The State of Maharashtra
Ravindra V. Ghuge
R.M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
