The High Court of Judicature at Bombay disposed of two writ petitions listed as infructuous. The petitioners did not appear, and no praecipe was filed to revive them.
Petitions disposed of as infructuous; liberty granted to petitioners to revive if the cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
347-WP-6714-2005.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6714 OF 2005 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1099 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6714 OF 2005
Narendra Kacheshwar Dani V/s.
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Petitioners
Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2366 OF 2014
Sandip Ghanshyam Dolas V/s.
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Petitioners
Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakde, G. P. a/w Mr. A. P. Vanarase, AGP for the Respondent/State.
C0RAM : G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2024
PC :
1. Learned Government Pleader, Appellate Side had circulated with the
Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed and disposed of as infructuous. These petitions are also in the list. This list of
infructuous matters was notified by the office by its notice dated 25 January 2024, by which the parties/advocates were intimated that if the proceedings
Kiran Kawre 1/2
347-WP-6714-2005.doc
have not become infructuous, then a praecipe be submitted in the office before its listing stating that the matter needs to be adjudicated. Accordingly, after such prior notice, these matters are listed today before this Court.
2 No praecipe has been received on behalf of the petitioners or the advocate for the petitioners stating that something would survive for adjudication in these petitions.
3 Even when these petitions were called out, none appears for the petitioners. It, therefore, appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute these petitions and/or they have become infructuous. These petitions are, accordingly, disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive these petitions, in the event, the petitioners feels that the cause of action still survive.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Kiran Kawre 2/2
Narendra Kacheshwar Dani
Sandip Ghanshyam Dolas
The State Of Maharashtra
G. S. Kulkarni
Firdosh P. Poníwalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
