Disposed

Javed Kadar Mujawar and Anr. v. Ajinkya Arunrao Ingawale and Ors.

Bombay HC28 Mar 2024WP/2267/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought a direction to the third respondent to decide a Grampanchayat complaint application. The court directed its decision on or before 28 June 2024 and warned of contempt for non-compliance, disposing of the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.3 directed to decide Complaint Application No.99 of 2023 on or before 28 June 2024.

Javed Kadar Mujawar and Anr. Vs Ajinkya Arunrao Ingawale and Ors. — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

17.wp.2267.2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.2267 OF 2024

¶4

Javed Kadar Mujawar & Anr. .. Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

Digitally signed by UTKARSH UTKARSH KAKASAHEB KAKASAHEB BHALERAO BHALERAO Date: 2024.04.01 10:43:16 +0530

¶7

Ajinkya Arunrao Ingawale & Ors.

¶8

.. Respondents

¶9

Mr.Pandit Kasar, Advocates for the Petitioners.

¶10

Mr.H.I.Patel i/b Imtiyaz Patel, Advocates for Respondent No.1.

¶11

Mr.A.I. Patel, Addl.G.P. a/w Ms.Tanaya D. Goswami, AGP for State.

¶12

CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ. DATE : MARCH 28, 2024

¶13

P. C.

¶14

1. The limited relief sought in the above Petition is to direct Respondent No.3 to decide the Grampanchayat Complaint Application No.99 of 2023 as expeditiously as possible.

¶15

2. The learned AGP has stated that the hearing in the above matter is concluded and the parties are directed to file their written submissions on or before 13^th May, 2024.

¶16

Utkarsh

¶17

Page 1 of 2 MARCH 28, 2024

¶18

17.wp.2267.2024.doc

¶19

3. Considering these peculiar circumstances, we dispose of the above Writ Petition by directing Respondent No.3 to decide the Grampanchayat Complaint Application No.99 of 2023 by 28^th June, 2024. In other words, under any circumstances, whether written submissions of the parties are filed or otherwise, the Grampanchayat Complaint Application No.99 of 2023 shall be decided by Respondent No.3 on or before 28^th June, 2024.

¶20

4. We make it clear to Respondent No.3 that if our directions are not complied with, we shall not hesitate to haul him up for contempt.

¶21

5. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶22

6. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/ Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

¶23

[SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN,J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.]

¶24

Page 2 of 2

¶25

MARCH 28, 2024

¶26

Utkarsh

Javed Kadar Mujawar and Anr. v. Ajinkya Arunrao Ingawale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Javed Kadar Mujawar and Anr. v. Ajinkya Arunrao Ingawale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagwanbhai K. Kajavadra vs Bureau of Immigration Ministry of Home Affairs and 2 Ors.

Deep Bella Co. Operative Housing Society Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Department of Revenue and Forest

Ashok Kumar Shrivastava vs Avvad Reality LLP

Shubh Saraswati Bahuudeshiya Sahkari Sanstha Marayadit Vs Authorised Officer Cum Chief Manager Ambit Finvest Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

M/S. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Javed Kadar Mujawar and Anr. Vs Ajinkya Arunrao Ingawale and Ors.