Petitioner filed a writ petition. The counsel for the petitioner submitted a motion to withdraw the petition. The court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn on instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2250.42.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 WRIT PETITION NO. 2250 OF 2024
Dinkar Sakharam Jadhav & others ….Petitioners
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others …..Respondents
Mr. S. B. Solanke, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for the State.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND R. M. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 12th MARCH, 2024.
PER COURT :
motion has been circulated on instructions from the Petitioners to withdraw this Petition.
as withdrawn on instructions.
( R. M. JOSHI) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Dinkar Sakharam Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
Ravindra V. Ghuge
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
