Writ petition withdrawn at the request of counsel, on instructions from the petitioner's son and power of attorney holder, who sought leave to withdraw; the court granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 22 of 2024
Andreza
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.22 OF 2024
VEERAJU. V. Versus
THE MAPUSA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK OF GOA LTD., MAPUSA AND 6 ORS.,
... PETITIONER
... RESPONDENTS
Mr. K.Braganza, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM:- M. S. SONAK & VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ.
DATED :- 5th February, 2024
P.C.
Mr. Braganza, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, based on instructions from the Petitioner's son, who is also the Petitioner's Power of Attorney holder, seeks leave to withdraw this Petition. The Petitioner's son and duly constituted Power of Attorney holder is present in the Court.
VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J.
M. S. SONAK, J.
ANDREZA PEREIRA Digitally signed by ANDREZA PEREIRA Date: 2024.02.05 17:42:21 +05'30'
Page 1 of 1 5th February, 2024
Veeraju. V.
The Mapusa Urban Cooperative Bank of Goa Ltd., Mapusa
M. S. Sonak
Valmiki Sa Menezes
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
