A writ petition concerning matrimonial matters was not pressed by the petitioner, who had instead sought reliefs from the Supreme Court regarding return of belongings from the matrimonial home. The Bombay High Court disposed of the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.WP.218.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition NO. 218 OF 2017
Poonam Jaidev Shroff ...Petitioner Versus Jaidev Rajnikant Shroff ...Respondent
Adv. Chandana Salgaonkar a/w. Adv. Anish Nair, Adv. Udit M ehta i/b. Naik Naik & co., for the Petitioner.
Mr. Navroz Seervai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sameer Tapia, Ms. Komal Joshi, Ms. Siddhi Doshi and Mr. Rohan Marathe i/b. ALMT Legal for the Respondent.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 23 FEBRUARY 2024
P.C.:
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1
Amol D. Nawale
Poonam Jaidev Shroff
Jaidev Rajnikant Shroff
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
