A 2016 writ petition lay dormant after August 2017 with no efforts by the petitioners or their advocate to circulate it. The High Court dismissed it for non-prosecution, noting the petitioners appeared not interested in pursuing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
V.A.Tikam 36- WP 215 of 2016.doc
VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM
Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM
Date: 2024.02.09 12:24:22 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 215 OF 2016
Sparsh Dilip Ahuja and Anr. .. Petitioners
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
None for Petitioners.
Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for the State.
CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 5th FEBRUARY, 2024.
P. C.:-
It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the Petition.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK,J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Sparsh Dilip Ahuja
Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
Anr.
A. S. Gadkari
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
