The high court disposed of a writ petition after the parties amicably resolved their dispute and presented a settlement agreement involving a monetary payment of Rs. 40,000/-.
The writ petition was disposed of in terms of the consent terms and settlement agreement between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31-wp2092-2018.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2092 OF 2018
VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV
Digitally signed byVAIBHAV RAMESHJADHAVDate: 2024.03.0717:03:41 +0530
Balaji Spinning & Weaving Mill … Petitioner V/s. Savarappa Hanmantu Kenchanal … Respondent
Mr. Suhas S. Inamdar for the petitioner.
Ms. Vilasini Balsubramanian for the respondent.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 7, 2024
P.C.:
1
31-wp2092-2018.doc
consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
2
Balaji Spinning & Weaving Mill
Savarappa Hanmantu Kenchanal
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
