Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, which the court granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-wp208-2024.doc
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.208 OF 2024
ATUL
GANESH KULKARNI
Digitally signed byATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2024.01.05 16:02:16 +0530
Ratnabai Malkari Koli… Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.… Respondents
Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugle for the petitioner.
Mr. Y.D. Patil, AGP for the respondents/State.
CORAM:AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:JANUARY 5, 2024
P.C.:
1. Learned advocate for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner who is present in Court, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.
3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Ratnabai Malkari Koli
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court