Criminal writ petition called out twice for hearing; no one appeared for the petitioner in either session, so the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:25688-DB
ssm 229-wp2079.10.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2079 OF 2010
Kisan Raju Mistry …..Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra …..Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Hulke APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2023.
P.C.:-
when none appeared for the Petitioner. It was therefore kept back and called out for hearing in the second session. In the second session also none appears for the Petitioner.
(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Kisan Raju Mistry
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
