A writ petition challenging the grant of a tender to respondent No.4 was dismissed as infructuous because the duration of the tender had already expired, leaving no live challenge for the court to adjudicate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:573-DB
26 WP-6-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.6 OF 2023
[Accurex Services (India) Pvt Ltd. . Vs . State of Maharashtra and Ors.]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Mr N. A. Gaikwad, Advocate for Petitioner. Ms R. V. Sharma, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr S. M. Bhangde, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR, JJ. D ATE : 16th JANUARY, 2024 .
. The petition questions the grant of tender to the respondent No.4. The duration of the tender admittedly is over, in view of which, we do not see necessity to go in the challenge raised herein, as the challenge has become infructuous.
(M. S. JAWALKAR, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
TAMBE
Accurex Services (India) Pvt Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
Respondent No.4
AVINASH G. GHAROTE
M. S. JAWALKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
