Petitioners, original defendants in a civil suit whose judgment led to an order granting police protection, sought relief. As they had already filed a Misc. Appeal against that judgment, the court directed them to seek orders from the Appellate Court and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:4543-DB
1994.24wp (1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
925 WRIT PETITION NO. 1994 OF 2024
RUSTUM NARAYAN HARNE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Mr K. F. Shingare, Advocate for Petitioners; Mr S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
R. M. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 28th February, 2024
PER COURT:
1994.24wp (2)
(R. M. JOSHI, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
sjk
Signed by: Sachin J Kulkarni Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 04/03/2024 19:22:19
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging a police protection order founded on a civil suit judgment should be entertained while the judgment is under appeal?
Rustum Narayan Harne and Others
The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary
Respondent No.2/Administrative Officer, office of the Police Commissioner, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar
Ravindra V. Ghuge
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
