Pinto Babu Sham v. Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board (Mhada)
Bombay HCWP/1964/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order issues notice to the Respondent in the Writ Petition and humdast permits the next hearing, while clarifying no relief has been granted favouring the Petitioners till date.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
RVC 36 -Wp-1964-2024.doc
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶3
WRIT PETITION NO. 1964 OF 2024
¶4
Pinto Babu Sham & Ors. … Petitioners
¶5
V/s. Mumbai Housing & AreaDevelopment Board (MHADA) … Respondent
¶6
Mr. M.P. Mishra for Petitioner.
¶7
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
¶8
DATE : 28th November 2024.
¶9
P.C. :
¶10
- Issue notice to the Respondent, returnable on 12th December
¶12
- Humdast permitted.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Pinto Babu Sham & Ors.
- respondent
Mumbai Housing & Area Development Board
Coram
AI extract
A. S. Gadkari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court