Petitioner not pressing her tribe claim for validity and instead seeks absorption on a supernumerary post under government policy; she to move representation within four weeks and petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:9159-DB
1 08-wp 1883.2018.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1883 OF 2018
( Ku. Madhavi d/o Sadashiv Naware vs. Joint Commissioner & Vice Chairman, Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Division Amravati and others )
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S.R.Narnaware, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S.Rao, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.1.
Mr. U. J. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.3.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 16, 2024
Mr.Narnaware, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is not pressing the tribe claim for issuance of validity and intend to avail the benefit of the policy of the Government wherein the services of the petitioner can be absorbed on a supernumerary post. He further submits that appropriate representation to that effect shall be moved by the petitioner to the employer within a period of four weeks from today.
( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) ( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )
KOLHE
Ku. Madhavi d/o Sadashiv Naware
Joint Commissioner & Vice Chairman, Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Division Amravati
Respondent No.3
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
