Disposed

Mahalaxmi Homeopathic Medical College Hospital Research through Dr. J. Bhanuse v. the Union of India through Ministry of Ayush and Ors.

Bombay HC14 Dec 2024WP/18666/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Ministry of AYUSH to decide the petitioner's appeal against the denial of undergraduate and postgraduate seats within three weeks. The court disposed of the writ petition with liberty to decide the appeal on merits despite the cut-off date having passed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to decide appeal within three weeks; writ petition disposed of with liberty.

Mahalaxmi Homeopathic Medical College Hospital… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Digitally signed by SNEHA SNEHA ABHAY ABHAY DIXIT DIXIT Date: 2024.12.14 11:46:03 +0530

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.18666 OF 2024

¶4

Mahalaxmi Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital and Research Center, Satara .. Petitioner Versus The Union of India, Through Ministry of AYUSH, New Delhi and Ors. .. Respondents

¶5

Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan with Ms. Vishakha Shelar, Mr. Bajrang Solunke and Mr. Ajinkya Walekar, Advocates for the Petitioner.

¶6

Mr. Rui Rodrigues with Mr. A.A. Garge, Advocates for Respondent No.1.

¶7

Mrs. Purnima Awasthi, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

¶8

Mr. Sameer Khedekar, Advocate for Respondent No.4.

¶9

Ms. D.S. Deshmukh, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.5 to 7.

¶10

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 14^TH DECEMBER 2024. [ THROUGH HYBRID HEARING ]

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 18^th September 2024 passed by the Medical Assessment and Rating Board for Homoeopathy thereby denying permission to the Medical College and Hospital to undertake admissions for 60 seats for Undergraduate B.H.M.S. Course for academic year 2024-25 and 18 Seats for Postgraduate Course. Against the aforesaid adjudication, the petitioner has preferred an Appeal before the respondent no.1. During pendency of the Appeal, the petitioner seeks permission to undertake admissions subject to consideration of the Appeal. 1/2

¶13

901-WP-18666-2024.doc Dixit

¶14

Considering the fact that the Medical Assessment and Rating Board for Homoeopathy has denied permission to undertake such admissions, the only direction that can be issued to the respondent no.1 is to decide the Appeal preferred by the petitioner within a period of three weeks from receiving copy of this order.

¶15

The Appeal preferred by the petitioner shall be decided on its own merits notwithstanding the fact that the cut-off date for admitting students has crossed. Keeping all points on merits open, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶16

Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order.

¶17

[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]

¶18

2/2

¶19

901-WP-18666-2024.doc Dixit

Mahalaxmi Homeopathic Medical College Hospital Research through Dr. J. Bhanuse v. the Union of India through Ministry of Ayush and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahalaxmi Homeopathic Medical College Hospital Research through Dr. J. Bhanuse v. the Union of India through Ministry of Ayush and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pyramid Developers vs Union India through Ministry of Finance

Sandeep Sudam Kamble vs Secretary Education Department and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra through Its Additional Chief Secretary Home Dept vs Pramila Vitthal Kawale

Ebix Cash Limited vs Ashok Kumar Goel

Ebix Cash World Money Limited vs Ashok Kumar Goel

The State of Maharashtra through Its Additional Chief Secretary Home Department vs Sonyabapu Bansi Deshmukh and Ors.