Petitioner had sought payment of increments for July 2021 and July 2022. Respondent No. 3's counsel stated the increments had since been paid, rendering the petition infructuous; the court dismissed it as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
5 wp 185-2023
WRIT PETITION NO. 185 OF 2023
Nalanda Ramdasji Raut
...Versus…
Deputy Director of Education, Nagpur Division, Nagpur and others
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND SMT M.S. JAWALKAR, JJ. DATE : 25.09.2024.
Mr. Thakare, learned Counsel for respondent No. 3, upon instructions, makes a statement that the increments for the year July, 2021 and July 2022, have been paid to the petitioner, in view of which, the petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such.
(SMT M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
Jayashree..
Nalanda Ramdasji Raut
Deputy Director of Education, Nagpur Division, Nagpur
Avinash G. Gharote
M.S. Jawalkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
