Petitioner sought adjustment of property tax amounts against MCGM. The Single Judge held the petition would not lie before the Single Judge and directed counsel to place the matter before the Division Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
60 Wp-18099-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 18099 OF 2024
Joy Frozen Foods Private Ltd. ...Petitioner. Versus MCGM. ...Respondent.
Mr. Darshit Jain for the Petitioner. Mr. Anand Khairnar for the Respondent-MCGM
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : December 10, 2024.
P. C. :
1. Petition seeks a direction for adjustment of property tax amount. Therefore, petition will not lie before the Single Judge.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner to take appropriate steps for placing the matter before the Division Bench.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Patil-SR
Signed by: Sachin R. Patil Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 11/12/2024 12:35:59
Joy Frozen Foods Private Ltd.
MCGM
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
