Writ petition seeking a direction to decide a pending Maharashtra Land Revenue Code appeal filed in October 2020. Court directed Respondent No. 1, after following due procedure and hearing stakeholders, to decide the proceedings within 120 days and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:4042-DB
920-WP-1766-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1766 OF 2024
Subhash Sakharam Kale And Others
….Petitioners
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its
State Minister And Others
…..Respondents
…..
Mr. K. D. Khade, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. A. B. Girase, GP for Respondents - State
...
PER COURT :
1.The only prayer pressed by the Petitioners is
that the pending Appeal under Section 247(1) of the
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 filed on
21.10.2020, be decided by Respondent No. 1, within a
particular time frame.
2.The learned GP submits that at least 150 days
may be granted.
3.Considering that the Appeal has been lodged in
October, 2020, we would expect Respondent No. 1 to
follow the due procedure laid down in law and by
Page 1 of 2
920-WP-1766-2024.odt
granting adequate opportunity of hearing to all the
stakeholders, would decide the said proceedings within
120 days from today.
4.With the above directions, this Writ Petition
is disposed off.
(R. M. JOSHI, J)
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J)
Malani
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Respondent No. 1 should be directed to decide the pending appeal under Section 247(1) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code within a time frame.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subhash Sakharam Kale And Others
The State Of Maharashtra Through Its State Minister
R. M. Joshi
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court