In a writ petition, the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad took cognizance of petitioners seeking to lock teaching preferences despite securing Computer Application degrees instead of Sciences. The court noted prima facie ineligibility and issued notice to respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
82wp1758-24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
82 WRIT PETITION NO. 1758 OF 2024
RAHUL GANGADHARRAO DHAWALE AND ANOTHER
….Petitioners VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
.....Respondents
Mr. Jadhav Kailas B, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for the Respondents-State Mr. Anup Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 Exam Council
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 12th February, 2024
ORDER :
Page 1 of 2
82wp1758-24
Science faculty and has completed the degree course in Bachelor of Computer Application. Taking into account the prescribed qualification, prima facie both are ineligible.
( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
JPChavan
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the preference of petitioners securing Computer Application degrees to teach Science at 6th-8th standards contradicts prescribed qualifications.
Whether the rejection of applications for locking teaching preferences was justifiable prima facie.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAHUL GANGADHARRAO DHAWALE AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
EXAM COUNCIL
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
