Aditi Anil Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's claim to belong to the Thakar, Scheduled Tribe category. The court issued notice to respondents and listed the matter for fresh admission on a specific date.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by GAURI GAURI AMIT AMIT GAEKWAD GAEKWAD Date: 2024.12.07 10:56:30 +0530
32.WP-17335-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.17335 OF 2024
Aditi Anil Gaikwad ….Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. ....Respondents
Ms. Komal Gaikwad i/b. Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the Petitioner. Mr. A.K. Naik, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE : 3rd DECEMBER, 2024
P.C. :-
- The Petitioner has suffered rejection of her validity
claim of belonging to the Thakar, Scheduled Tribe category, vide the impugned order. It is conveyed to us that the Petitioner is not pursuing any professional course and is not in any employment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aditi Anil Gaikwad
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Ors.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Yusuf Samad Khan vs the State of Maharashtra (Thr the Ministry of Law and Judiciary Dept) and Ors.
Chandrashekhar Shamrao Patil vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, General Administration Department
Udaykumar Subhash Suryawanshi vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Tribal Development and Anr.
M/S Mamata Medical and General Stores Throu. Its Prop Madanlal Daulatramji Vyas vs the Assistant Commissioner Food and Drugs Administration and Ors.