The court declined a request to recall a witness for a preliminary issue regarding the fairness of an enquiry, holding it unnecessary for decision but permitting notice for production of records if the issue is decided in favor of the petitioner. The writ petitions were consequently disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-9-wp-1731-2024.doc
Shabnoor
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1731 OF 2024
SHABNOORAYUBPATHAN Digitallysigned bySHABNOORAYUBPATHANDate:2024.02.1517:40:55+0530
Mahesh Prakash Gangawane … Petitioner V/s. M/s. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. … Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1732 OF 2024
Devidas Balasaheb Batte … Petitioner V/s. M/s. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. … Respondents
Mr. Rahul B. Khot, for Petitioner.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 15, 2024
P.C.:
“1. Does the second party prove that the enquiry conducted by first party against him is not legal, fair and proper ?”
1
8-9-wp-1731-2024.doc
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the enquiry conducted by the employer against the petitioner is not legal, fair and proper?
SHABNOORAYUBPATHAN
M/s. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd.
Devidas Balasaheb Batte
M/s. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd.
AMIT BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
