The High Court dispensed with notice to certain respondents and directed the State Information Commissioner, Nasik, to expedite and conclude pending second appeals under the Right to Information Act within three months.
Directive to expedite and conclude pending second appeals within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:2820-DB
{1} 914 sr.no..odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1646 OF 2024
Santosh s/o. Suryabhan Gholap
… Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others.
… Respondent/s.
Mr. Ashwin Sakolkar, Advocate h/f. Mr. S.V. Chandole, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. A.R. Kale, AGP for the respondents.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, C.J. & ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 9th FEBRUARY, 2024.
P.C. :-
914 sr.no..odt
the State Information Commissioner Nasik – Respondent No.2, to expedite the hearing of the said Second Appeals and conclude the same, as early as possible.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
grt/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the State Information Commissioner to expedite the hearing of the pending second appeals filed by the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh s/o. Suryabhan Gholap
The State of Maharashtra
The State Information Commissioner Nasik
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
