Disposed

Sumit Anil Pawar and Ors. v. Ld District Collector of Satara and Anr.

Bombay HC14 Nov 2024WP/16407/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court directed petitioners to inform the Tahsildar about lack of transport vehicles and submit other documents within one week. Tahsildar was directed to decide on excavation applications within ten days of receiving information.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to Tahsildar to decide excavation applications within 10 days of receiving documents and information from petitioners.

Sumit Anil Pawar and Ors. Vs Ld District… — Mining and Natural Resources | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

WRIT PETITION NO.16407 OF 2024

¶3

Sumit Anil Pawar and Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. District Collector of Satara and Anr. .. Respondents

¶4

Mr. Manoj A. Patil with Mr. Shubham Dhenge, Advocates for the Petitioners.

¶5

Mr. Kedar Dighe, Additional Government Pleader with Smt. T.D. Goswami, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent-State of Maharashtra.

¶6

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR &

¶7

RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ

¶8

DATE : 14^TH NOVEMBER 2024.

¶9

P.C. :

¶10

The limited request made by the petitioners is for consideration of the request made for grant of permission to excavate Minor Minerals from Gat No.308/1, Plot No.7 situated at Village Nagewadi, Taluka & District Satara. It is pointed out that in the earlier round of litigation, this Court by the order dated 30^th August 2024 passed in Writ Petition No.11918 of 2024 had directed the Tahsildar, Satara to re-consider the petitioners’ applications dated 13^th June 2024 and 5^th August 2024 in accordance with the prevailing Rules. Pursuant thereto, the Tahsildar on 25^th September 2024 has sought furnishing of various documents mentioned in the said communication to be done by the petitioners. It is the case of the

¶11

1/3

¶12

Digitally signed by SNEHA SNEHAABHAY ABHAY DIXIT DIXIT Date:2024.11.18 15:14:29 +0530

¶13

15-WP-16407-2024.doc Dixit

¶14

petitioners that by communication dated 29^th September 2024, all the relevant documents have been submitted. The petitioners however submit that they do not own any transportation vehicle and hence details of the same cannot be furnished. It is for this reason that the petitioners’ applications are not yet decided.

¶15

In the aforesaid facts, the following directions would serve the ends of justice :-

¶16

(a) Within a period of one week from today, the petitioners shall inform the Tahsildar, Satara that they do not possess transportation vehicles, details of which were sought vide the communication dated 25^th September 2024. In addition, the petitioners shall furnish information with regard to the mode of transportation of such excavated Minor Minerals. All other documents mentioned in the said communication shall be supplied by the petitioners.

¶17

(b) Within a period of ten days of receiving such communication from the petitioners, the Tahsildar, Satara shall take a decision on the petitioners’ applications dated 13^th June 2024 and 5^th August 2024.

15-WP-16407-2024.doc

Dixit

adjudication, they are free to take steps in accordance

¶22

with law.

¶23

The writ petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.

¶24

[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ]

¶25

[ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]

¶26

3/3

¶27

15-WP-16407-2024.doc Dixit

Sumit Anil Pawar and Ors. v. Ld District Collector of Satara and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit Anil Pawar and Ors. v. Ld District Collector of Satara and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aananda Vinayak Kasurde Vs Recovery Officer Satara District Co. Operative Soc. and Ors.

Shree Sant Shiromani Namdev Maharaj Charitable Trust'S through Its Office Superintendent Vs the Mah. University of Health Science through Its Registrar and Ors.

Siddhanath Sugar Mills Ltd. Thr Its Authorised Signatory and Ors. Vs Punjab National Bank

Sahara Institute of Nursing Education of Shree Sant Shiromani Namdev Maharaj Charitabel Trust Vs Maharashtra University of Health Science Thr. Dr. Kalidas Chavan and Ors.

The Liquidation Committee, Bhudargad Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Ltd. and Ors. Vs Shri. Jaganath Vinayak Dhopeshwarkar and Ors.

Vaibhav Dilip Bhivate Vs Panchaganga Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. Kolhapur and Anr.