Petition concerning the petitioner's service conditions; court noted an alternate remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal and disposed of the petition without going into merits, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:4625-DB
1 7 wp161.2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.161/2020
Mohtashim Mohammad Akhtar s/o Abdul Hameed Jamal V/s Union of India and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Dr. A.H. Jamal, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.A.Chaudhari, Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 5.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : APRIL 23, 2024.
The issue pertains to the service conditions of the petitioner, the petitioner has an alternate remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Mukund Ambulkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition on service conditions is maintainable when the petitioner has an alternate remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal?
Mohtashim Mohammad Akhtar s/o Abdul Hameed Jamal
Union of India and others
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
