The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution due to the parties' repeated absence, having previously dismissed and restored the matter multiple times.
Writ petition dismissed; rule discharged; interim stay vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:10633
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
206 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 159 OF 2006
M.M. KOTHARI AND ORS. VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
APP for Respondent/s-State : Ms. D. S. Jape.
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J. DATE : 11.06.2024
PER COURT :-
to 06.12.2019. Thereafter, the matter seems not listed. More particularly, not attended by the parties. Considering the past history of the matter, it appears that the parties have no interest in the writ petition.
prosecution.
vmk/-
M.M. KOTHARI AND ORS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
