Allowed

Ajay Dinkar Tambe and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC12 Jul 2024WP/1587/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court allowed a criminal writ petition filed by a husband and siblings to quash criminal cases under the Indian Penal Code. The court considered the victim's settlement agreement and her expressed consent to quash the proceedings, leading to the disposal of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed on terms of clause (c) due to settlement between parties and consent of the victim to quash the crime.

Ajay Dinkar Tambe and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

RVC 18 Wp-1587-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1587 OF 2024

¶5

Ajay Dinkar Tambe Age 32 years Indin Inhabitant Occ. Service, presently residing at Flat No.402, Gayatri CHSL, Sadan Wadi, Bhandup West, Mumbai-400 078. 2) Vijaya Dinkar Tambe Aged about 54 Years, Indian Inhabitant Occ. Housewife. 3) Monica Akshay Tambe Aged about 34 years, Indian Inhabitant Occ. Service. 4) Mr. Akshay Dinkar Tambe Aged about 34 years, Indina Inhabitant Occ. Service, Petitioner Nos.2 to 4 presently residing at Flat No.1202, Kshitij Vivant CHSL, Lake Road, Sadan Wadi, Near Bhandup Police Station, Bhandup West, Mumbai-400 078 … Petitioners V/s. 1) The State of Maharashtra through Investigation Officer, C.R.No.2215/2022 at Sakinaka Police Station Mumbai-400 072. 2) Mrs. Vaishali Ajay Tambe Aged about 32 years, Indian Inhabitant, Occ. Service, presently residing at B/32, Shiv Prabha Society, Andheri Ghatkopar Road, Asalpha, Mumbai-400 072. … Respondents

¶6

1/3

¶7

RVC 18 Wp-1587-2024.doc

¶8

Adv. Maheshwari Dave, Ms. Gauri B. Govande and Mr. Nilesh Singh for Petitioners. Mr. A.I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Rahul Arote for Respondent No.2.

¶9

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND

¶10

DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 12^th July 2024.

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

Husband, sister-in-law and brother-in-law, respectively of Respondent No.2 have filed present Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for quashing of Case No.P.W/6600603/2023, pending on the file of learned Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, 66^th Court, Andheri, Mumbai, arising out of C.R. No.2215 of 2022 dated 22^nd November, 2022, under Sections 323, 498-A, 406, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, with the consent of Respondent No.2.

¶13

Learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 tendered across the bar her Affidavit dated 12^th July 2024, duly affirmed before the Assistant Registrar of this Court. It is stated therein that, Petitioners and Respondent No.2, have settled their disputes among themselves and have executed the Consent Terms dated 3^rd December 2023. That, in pursuance of the said Consent Terms, she has received necessary compensation from the Petitioners. In para No.7 thereof, she has given her no objection for quashing of the crime in question.

¶14

2/3

¶15

RVC 18 Wp-1587-2024.doc

¶16

2.1) Respondent No.2 personally present in the Court and she

¶17

through her Advocate, reiterates the contents of her Affidavit dated 12^th July 2024 and her no ‘objection’ for quashing of the said crime.

¶18

In view thereof, Application is allowed in terms of clause (c).

¶19

( DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

¶20

Digitally signed RAJESH by RAJESHVASANT VASANT CHITTEWAN CHITTEWAN Date: 2024.07.19 11:34:01 +0530

¶21

3/3

Ajay Dinkar Tambe and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Dinkar Tambe and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aftab Anwar Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra

Neelam Nimit Gajjar vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Yogesh Bhadra @ Bhanushali vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Krish Sanjeev Kothari and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Tabassum Begum Wife of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (Zaidi) vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Tabassum Begam Wife of Mohammed Wasi Sayed (Zaidi) vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.