Writ petition challenging specific clause of a Family Court interlocutory order on overnight access summary dismissed for lack of merit.
Writ petition dismissed; hearing of related Marriage Petition expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
908-wp15410-23.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed VASANT by VASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAO IDHOL IDHOL Date: 2024.03.07 WRIT PETITION NO.15410 OF 2023 11:31:01 +0530
Nilesh S. Sawant ...Petitioner V/s. Poonam N. Sawant ...Respondent
Mr.Paras Yadav with Mr.Sumant Patale for the Petitioner.
Mr.Kishor Hase for the Respondent.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 1ST MARCH, 2024.
P.C. :-
Petitioner was specifically directed to take instructions from his client. Since the impugned order is entirely in favour of his client, except clause No.6 of the operative part of the impugned order dated 13 September 2023. The order passed yesterday i.e.
on 29 February 2024 is reproduced hereinbelow :-
“1. This Writ Petition challenges the order dated 13 September 2023 to the limited
1/2
908-wp15410-23.doc
extend of clause No.6 of the operative part of the order. The clause No.6 of the operative part of the order is reads as under :-
“6. Overnight access on Saturday and Sunday and 50% vacation access is hereby rejected.”
instructions from his client to argue this Petition on merits. No case is made out by the Petitioner to interfere with the impugned
order dated 13 September 2023 passed by the Family Court, Pune.
pending before the Family Court, Pune is expedited.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2/2
Nilesh S. Sawant
Poonam N. Sawant
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
