Plaintiff sought amendment of prayer clauses in a pending suit to include defendant nos. 1 to 4 alongside defendants 6 to 8. The High Court permitted the amendment, upholding the impugned order subject to that modification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:30410
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1530 OF 2024
Radhakisan Appa Kasar VERSUS
Balu Fakira Mali And Others
Mr. S. V. Dixit, Advocate for petitioner Mr. K. N. Shermale, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 4
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2024
PER COURT :-
1 of 2
938-WP-1530-2024.odt
effect. This will only delay the hearing of the suit. Hence in the interest
of justice, petition is disposed of in following terms.
a) The petitioner/plaintiff is permitted to amend the prayer clause 14A-(1) – 14A-(2) by incorporating words “Defendant nos. 1 to 4 and 6 to 8” in both clauses in place of “Defendant Nos.1 and 6 to 8”.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
bsj
2 of 2
938-WP-1530-2024.odt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner/plaintiff could amend the prayer clauses in the suit to seek relief against defendant nos. 1 to 4 and 6 to 8.
Radhakisan Appa Kasar
Balu Fakira Mali
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
