Radha Dilip Parekh and Another v. Ms Shah Traders through Its Partner Mr Siddharth Parekh
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay HC Aurangabad bench; WRIT PETITION NO. 1528 OF 2024; Radha Dilip Parekh And Another v. Ms Shah Traders (partner Siddharth Parekh); R.M. Joshi, J.; decided June 13, 2024. Petitioners challenged bracketed observations in paragraph 4 of trial Court's order passed on their objection to Defendants' counter claim (“As plaintiffs in original suit have frozen the bank accounts pertaining to partnership firm”). Court deemed observations absolutely unnecessary and potentially indicative of acceptance of counter claim on merits; struck out/deleted the bracketed portion; petition partly allowed, remainder of order unchanged. No statutes and no precedent cases cited in the judgment.
What did the court decide?
The bracketed portion stands deleted from the impugned order; the rest of the order remains unchanged. ¶6