Writ petition disposed as infructuous after the subject suit was remanded to the District Court; counsel for some respondents directed to file Vakalatnama.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13.WP.1504.2024.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1504 OF 2024
Shivaji Gopal Kurhade .. Petitioner
Versus
Ramchandra Gopal Kurhade and Ors. .. Respondents
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 06, 2024
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Misal, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Mr.
Shrimangale, learned Advocate for Respondents.
2. As informed by Mr. Misal, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
3. Mr. Shrimangale, learned Advocate appears for Respondent Nos.2, 3, 5, 8, 9 and 10.
4. He concurs with the submissions made by Mr. Misal.
5. In view of the order of remand of subject suit before the District Court, the challenge maintained before this Court has become
infructuous.
1 of 2
13.WP.1504.2024.doc
6. Mr. Shrimangale is directed to file his Vakalatnama.
Registry is directed to accept the same.
7. In view of the above, Writ Petition is disposed.
H. H. SAWANT
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed by HARSHADA HARSHADA HANUMANT HANUMANTSAWANT SAWANT Date: 2024.02.0710:34:04 +0530
2 of 2
Shivaji Gopal Kurhade
Ramchandra Gopal Kurhade
Milind N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
