Five writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra were permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioners' counsel and disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-WP-14960-2022.DOC
Ashvini Narwade
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14960 OF 2022
Late Latabai Gabaji Shirke (Gurav) … Petitioner through Lrs. Digitally signed byASHVINI Shri. Dattatraya Gabaji Shirke (Gurav) ASHVINI BAPPASAHEB BAPPASAHEBKAKDE KAKDEDate: Versus 2024.01.04 17:51:42 +0530 State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 14962 OF 2022 Nana Sahadu Dhandre … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 14963 OF 2022 Dagdu Maruti Gopale … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 14964 OF 2022 Bajirao Dagdu Daware … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents
Page 1 of 2 3 January, 2024
13-WP-14960-2022.DOC
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 14965 OF 2022
Late Gopala Dagdu Karwande … Petitioner Through Lrs. Shri Tukaram Barku Karwande
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Sumit V. Khaire for the Petitioners in all Petitions. Mr. Sachin H. Kankal, AGP for the Respondent-State in all Petitions.
_______________________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATED: 3 January, 2024
P.C.
costs.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI , J.)
Page 2 of 2 3 January, 2024
Late Latabai Gabaji Shirke (Gurav) through Lrs. Shri Dattatraya Gabaji Shirke (Gurav)
Nana Sahadu Dhandre
Dagdu Maruti Gopale
Bajirao Dagdu Daware
Late Gopala Dagdu Karwande through Lrs. Shri Tukaram Barku Karwande
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
G. S. Kulkarni
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
