Decree holder in a specific performance suit sought leave to deposit the balance consideration amount more than twelve years after the decree, claiming inadvertence. The trial Court rejected the application while execution proceedings remained pending. The High Court found no error and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:BHC-NAG:2493
15.wp.1448.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.1448 OF 2024
Shri Samrendra S/o Ravindranath Mishra .Vs. Ramdas S/o Ziblaji Belkhede
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri S.S. Rao, Advocate for petitioner.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : 01/03/2024
JUDGE
C.L. Dhakate
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial Court erred in rejecting the decree holder's belated application for permission to deposit the balance consideration amount after twelve years?
Shri Samrendra S/o Ravindranath Mishra
Ramdas S/o Ziblaji Belkhede
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
