Writ petition challenging an order/communication dated 15 July 2024 passed by Respondent No.3. The court held the communication was not a quasi-judicial order and did not pertain to its assignment, and directed removal from board.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-WP-14309-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.14309 OF 2024
Haresh Mohandas Lalwani And Anr. ...Petitioners Versus
State Of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary And Ors. ...Respondents
Adv. Girish R. Agrawal for the Petitioners. Adv. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the State. Adv. Minal Chandnani for the Intervenor.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : October 22, 2024.
P. C. :
1. The challenge in the present Petition is to the order/communication dated 15th July, 2024 passed by Respondent No.3.
2. As the same is not a quasi judicial order, the matter is not pertaining to the assignment of this Court.
3. Remove from board.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Harish
Signed by: Harish V. Chaudhari Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 24/10/2024 12:01:04
Haresh Mohandas Lalwani
State Of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
