4. Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants initially has drawn attention of this Court to the contentions of the application which takes exception to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 being shown as office bearers of the said educational institution and trustees of the trust. Apart from this, the documents filed along with application are referred to which pertain to change reports and proceedings before the Charity Commissioner. Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants submitted that the educational institution has not been represented before the Tribunal for want of notice to the present applicants. It is his further submission that for want of any opportunity being given to the educational institution, the correct facts were not brought to the notice of the Tribunal. He challenges the locus standi of the respondents to represent the Trust. During the course of the arguments it is submitted that the petitioner was appointed initially as a peon and thereafter he was wrongfully promoted as Assistant Teacher. It is also submitted that, in fact, petitioner had resigned from the service of the school as a peon. He, however, does not dispute the fact that the petitioner was originally appointed as a peon and the said appointment was made after following due process of law. It is alleged against one of the respondents that by receiving gratification from petitioner the record
