Mukund Sitaram Tambe and Ors. v. Yashwant Shankar Tambe and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged an injunction order in a partition suit. The court refused interim stay, ordered notice to respondents, and sought documents proving petitioner contention regarding consent for construction.
What the court decided
10-WP-14012-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SATISH SANGAR RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2024.11.12 10:51:44 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO.14012 OF 2024
Mukund Sitaram Tambe and Ors. ...Petitioners
V/s.
Yashwant Shankar Tambe and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr.Sushil A. Inamdar:Advocate for Petitioners.
CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 11th NOVEMBER 2024
P. C. :-
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether stay can be granted to the impugned order allowing construction injunction.
Whether document showing petitioner consent for construction was considered by two Courts below.
Whether notice should be issued to respondent before admitting the writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mukund Sitaram Tambe and Ors.
- respondent
Yashwant Shankar Tambe and Ors.
Coram
S. M. Modak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Amit Borkar
- Order 2 · Amit Borkar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Salim Abdul Wahab Shaikh vs Rohit Yogendra Bhalunkar and Ors.
Arnica Enterprises Private Limited through Authorised Signatory vs Irel (India) Limited
Gti Infotel Private Limited vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited through Chairman and Managing Director
M/S. Shantinath Developers (Virar) C/O. Mr. Kirit K. Mehta vs Competent Officer and District Deputy Registrar and Anr.