Three writ petitions challenging recruitment notifications for Judicial Magistrate First Class were disposed of. The court noted an identical earlier decision holding such relaxations invalid. The petitioners, having failed the oral exam, agreed to disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:6949-DB
903 to 905.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1279 OF 2022
Maya Keshavrao Kure
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Other
...
Mr. A. B. Kharosekar, Advocate for the Petitioner
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 1376 OF 2022
Sindhu Sanjaykumar Choudhari
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. A. G. Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 1421 OF 2022
Mariya Gamar Mahemood Khan
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. H. I. Pathan, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. D. R. Korade, A.A.A. Khan and Mr. R. K. Ingole,
AGPs for Respondents/State
Mr. M. B. Kolpe, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 in
WP/1279/2022
Mr. A. B. Kadethankar, Advocate for Respondent No. 3
...
CORAM:RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
R. M. JOSHI, JJ
DATE:MARCH 27, 2024
PER COURT :
1.The learned Advocate Shri. Kadethankar places
on record a judgment delivered by this Court at the
Page 1 of 2
903 to 905.odt
Principal Seat, dated 19.01.2024 in Writ Petition No.
356/2022 filed by Sagar Satish Patil. The issue in the
present Petitions is identical, pertaining to the
recruitment to the posts of Judicial Magistrate First
Class in the light of the Advertisement No. 270, dated
23.12.2021, published by MPSC. He submits that this
Court has ruled that relaxation in the light of the
Government Resolution dated 17.12.2021, would not be
available for such candidates.
2.The learned Advocates for the respective
Petitioners submit, on instructions, that though the
Petitioners appeared in the exam under interim orders
of this Court, they have failed in the oral exam and
these Petitions can be disposed off.
3.In view of the above and even on merits, these
Writ Petitions are disposed off.
Malani
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether relaxation in recruitment for Judicial Magistrate First Class under the impugned advertisement and Government Resolution was legally permissible.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sagar Satish PatilReferred¶34
Writ Petition No. 356/2022 filed by Sagar Satish Patil dated 19.01.2024
Maya Keshavrao Kure
Sindhu Sanjaykumar Choudhari
Mariya Gamar Mahemood Khan
The State Of Maharashtra
Ravindra V. Ghuge
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court