Writ petition against interim maintenance awarded to wife and son in a divorce petition. The High Court found the trial court erred on the petitioner's income, quashed the order subject to a Rs.5,00,000 deposit, and directed fresh decision within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:10740
949.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1371 OF 2024
VIRENDRA S/O HARIKISHAN BHARDWAJ VERSUS
RASHMI W/O VIRENDRA BHARDWAJ
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Ms M.R. Nagi, Advocate for the Petitioner/s Shri T.N. Charaniya, Advocate for the respondent No.1
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 06.09.2024
nd.thawre
949.odt
2
thus erred in considering the income of the petitioner as Rs.4 to 5 Lakhs for the said period. It is submitted that the trial Court has not considered the other contentions of the petitioner.
[N.R. BORKAR, J.]
nd.thawre
1 issue framed by the court
Was the interim maintenance award under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, based on an assumed income of Rs.4-5 lakhs, sustainable given the petitioner's lower declared income?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Virendra s/o Harikishan Bhardwaj
Rashmi w/o Virendra Bhardwaj
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
