A writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to prosecute the remedy already invoked by moving an application under the Right to Information Act.
Liberty granted to petitioner to prosecute his pending RTI application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:28563-DB
942.WP.13228.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.13228 OF 2024
KACHARU SHIVRAM BARGAL VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Narwade Narayan B. AGP for Respondents: Mr. M.K. Goyanka
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. DATE : 04.12.2024
PER COURT:
The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner
to prosecute the remedy which he has already invoked by moving an
application under the Right to Information Act.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
habeeb/
1/1
Kacharu Shivram Bargal
The State of Maharashtra through its Principal Secretary
Mangesh S. Patil
Prafulla S. Khubalkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
