The petitioner, appearing for himself, submitted that possession of the suit premises had been handed over and execution proceedings were disposed of. The Court found nothing surviving in the Writ Petition and disposed of it as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.wp.12852.2018speaking.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by VASANT VASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAO IDHOL IDHOL Date: 2024.02.28 11:11:29 +0530
Writ Petition NO. 12852 OF 2018
Mr. Rajendra Raghunath Chonkar Versus Nathuram Sadashiv Dandekar (since Decd.) Through L. Rs. & Ors.
..Petitioner
..Respondents
Ms.Druti Datar for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 13TH FEBRUARY , 2024.
P.C. :-
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1/1
This order is modified as per speaking to the minutes of the order dated 16th February, 2024.
Mr. Rajendra Raghunath Chonkar
Nathuram Sadashiv Dandekar (since Decd.) Through L. Rs. & Ors.
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
