Petitioners' revision under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code filed in February 2023 remained undecided for over a year. The High Court directed Respondent No. 3 to decide it on merits after hearing all parties within three months and made rule absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(21)-WP-12850-23.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL
Digitally signed by BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Date: 2024.06.28 10:59:13 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO.12850 OF 2023
Rajaram Jyoti Katte & Anr. ..Petitioners Versus
Shahaji Ramchandra Katte & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. Priyal G. Sarda a/w Shubham Sane, for the Petitioners. Smt. Reena A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR &
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 27th JUNE, 2024
P. C.
BGP. 1 of 2
(21)-WP-12850-23.doc .
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
2 of 2
BGP.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State should be directed to decide the pending Revision Application under Section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code within a fixed time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajaram Jyoti Katte
Shahaji Ramchandra Katte
A. S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
