Criminal Writ Petition seeking directions to respondent no.2 to decide a pending parole application. Court directly orders respondent to consider the application as per law within two weeks and disposes of the petition.
Respondent no.2 directed to consider petitioner's parole application within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-crwp1285.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1285 OF 2024
Kiran Raju Pujari VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Mrs.S.P.Chate, Advocate for petitioner Mrs.S.N.Deshmukh, APP for State
CORAM : R.G.AVACHAT AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ. DATE : JULY 25, 2024
ORDER :-
This petition is filed for direction to respondent no.2 to decide the application of the petitioner for parole leave, which is pending since 21.04.2024.
[NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] [R.G. AVACHAT, J.]
KBP
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent no.2 is directed to decide the petitioner's pending parole application within two weeks.
Kiran Raju Pujari
The State of Maharashtra
R.G. Avachat
Neeraj P. Dhote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
