Petitioners sought to withdraw their writ petition; counsel stated withdrawal upon instructions, statement accepted, petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp1256.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1256 OF 2019
( Dilip Balaji Chakkarwar and others ..vs.. Union of India and another )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. N.S. Deshpande, DSGI for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 29-11-2024
Mr. S.A. Mohta, learned Counsel for the petitioners, upon instructions, states that the petitioners want to withdraw the petition. Statement is accepted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
adgokar
Dilip Balaji Chakkarwar and others
Union of India
Respondent No. 2
Avinash G. Gharote
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
