Petitioners sought writ relief against a first Appellate Court's status quo order, with their vacation application pending there. Holding the petition not maintainable since Exh.20 application was already pending below, the High Court dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:2161
10.wp.1241.24.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.1241 OF 2024
Pradip Dyaneshwar Aasutkar and others .Vs. Kailash Kahiram Raut and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri K.R. Giripunje, Adv. h/f Ms R.S. Sirpurkar, Adv. for petitioners.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : 22/02/2024
JUDGE
C.L. Dhakate
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging a status quo order is maintainable while an application for its vacation is pending before the first Appellate Court.
Pradip Dyaneshwar Aasutkar and others
Kailash Kahiram Raut and others
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
