Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner as its issues stood covered by a Supreme Court decision in Gujarat State Petronet Ltd.; the court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-WP-12256-2022.DOC
Ashvini Narwade
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDITION
WRIT PETITION NO.12256 OF 2022
Nitin Art and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioner
Digitally signed byASHVINI ASHVINIBAPPASAHEB BAPPASAHEBKAKDE KAKDE Date: 2024.03.13 10:48:19 +0530
Versus
Union of India & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Prithvi Aringale i/b. Sonia Redkar for the Petitioner. Ms. Jaymala Ostwal for Respondents.
_______________________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATED: 8th MARCH, 2024
P.C.
as the issues in the Petition stands covered in view of the decision rendered in
Gujrat State Petronet Ltd. Krunal Engineering Works & Ors. (SLP (C) No.
31227 of 2018 .
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Page 1 of 1 8th March, 2024
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gujrat State Petronet Ltd. Krunal Engineering Works & Ors.Referred
SLP (C) No. 31227 of 2018
Nitin Art and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India
G. S. Kulkarni
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
