Writ petition was listed; however, no advocate appeared for the petitioner despite being called upon to file a praecipe if the matter was not infructuous. The court recorded the matter as infructuous and disposed of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to revive if anything survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
224-wp1203-2005.doc
ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Digitally signed byATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2024.02.08 14:57:04 +0530
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1203 OF 2005
Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd.
… PetitionerV/s.
Shrikant Bhalchandra Anikhindi &” Ors.… Respondents
None present.
CORAM :AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED:FEBRUARY 7, 2024
P.C.:
1.This petition has been notified as per the list of matters as
received from the Office of learned Government Pleader to have
become infructuous. As per office notice dated 25 January 2024,
Advocate for the petitioner/s was called upon to give a praecipe in
advance in case the petition has not become infructuous. Such
praecipe has not been received in regard to this petition.
2.Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as infructuous;
however, with liberty to the petitioner to revive the petition in case
something survives.
3. The writ petition is disposed of in above terms. No costs.
4. Pending interlocutory application/s, if any, does not survive and stands disposed of.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Shrikant Bhalchandra Anikhindi & Ors.
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court