This court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous after the lower authority informed that the tender process was cancelled due to receiving only one bid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-WP-11756-2024
Pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11756 OF 2024
Prithvi Outdoor Publicity LLP & Ors.
.. Petitioners
Versus
Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors. .. Respondents
PRAVIN
DASHARATH
PANDIT
Digitally signed by PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2024.08.20 14:46:25 +0530
Mr. Rohan Savant a/w Manisha Mane Bhangale, Bijal Vora and Akshay Arora i/by Parinam Law Associates for petitioners. Mr. Vishal P. Shirke for respondent nos.1 to 3. Mr. P. P. Kakade, Govt. Pleader with Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl. Govt. Pleader and Mrs. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for respondent no.4-State.
Mr. Santosh Moraskar, Dy. Engineer, NMMC, present.
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATE: 20th AUGUST, 2024
P.C.:
1. Mr. Vishal Shirke, learned counsel for the respondentCorporation, on instructions, states that pursuant to the subject tender since only one bid has been received, as such the tender process is being cancelled and the process of retender shall be resorted to.
2. In view of the aforesaid developments, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous, which is hereby dismissed as such.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Prithvi Outdoor Publicity LLP & Ors.
Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
