This writ petition directed the Education Officer (Secondary) to decide the petitioner's pending approval proposal as expeditiously as possible and in any case within five weeks, even based on a copy if the original is missing.
Directed to decide the proposal within five weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:25447-DB
wp11609.24
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
928 WRIT PETITION NO. 11609 OF 2024
Digambar Eknath Shinde VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary and others
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. R.D. Bhalerao AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.K. Tambe
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ. DATED : 17 OCTOBER 2024.
PER COURT :-
The petitioner’s proposal for grant of approval has been pending with respondent No.4 – Education Officer (Secondary), Exhibit “A”, since 27.12.2023.
(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL , J.)
rlj/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed to decide his proposal pending with the respondent within five weeks.
Digambar Eknath Shinde
The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary and others
MANGESH S. PATIL
SHAILESH P. BRAHME
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
